Dr. Thoreau Redcrow, a specialist in Kurdish Studies, recently voiced significant criticisms regarding the treatment of Abdullah Öcalan, highlighting a stark contradiction in Western policies. Speaking on the isolation of Öcalan, Redcrow described it as the “shame of the century”, emphasising the harsh conditions imposed on the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) leader by the Turkish state.
“Despite his advocacy for principles such as environmental preservation, women’s rights, and democratic confederalism — values the Western world claims to uphold — Öcalan remains in severe isolation,” stated Redcrow. He pointed out that while the West promotes democracy and human rights, inaction towards the Kurdish issue reveals a troubling paradox.
Redcrow detailed Öcalan’s isolated confinement on Turkey’s high-security prison island of İmralı, describing the detention conditions as an attempt to suppress his influential ideas, rather than a measure of public safety.
“They fear his mind more than his actions,” Redcrow reiterated, referring to the intellectual threat Öcalan poses with his writings and philosophical teachings, particularly on democratic confederalism which offers a model of governance focusing on local autonomy and environmental stewardship.
Moreover, Redcrow criticised the international community’s response, or lack thereof, to Öcalan’s situation. He noted the absence of action from bodies like the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT), which has the authority to intervene but has been notably passive in recent years.
“The CPT visited İmralı Island back in 2009 and recommended improvements to Öcalan’s conditions, yet we see little progress today,” he said.
The analyst also underscored the broader implications of Öcalan’s philosophy, which resonate among both Kurds and other stateless or marginalised groups globally. He lamented the hypocrisy of the West in selectively supporting democratic ideals, undermining the credibility of their human rights commitment.
Dr. Redcrow concluded by advocating for Öcalan’s release under European legal principles, emphasising the ‘right of hope’ that must allow a prisoner the prospect of release.
“By keeping Öcalan imprisoned under such conditions, the Western world not only contradicts its own values but also misses an opportunity to genuinely support democracy and human rights globally,” he argued.